What is share of model?
The primitive metric of AI visibility — how often a single engine surfaces a brand or product across a defined prompt set.
In detail
The arithmetic is deliberately simple: a brand with 20 mentions across 100 ChatGPT responses has a 20% share of model on ChatGPT for that prompt set. Run the identical prompts on Perplexity and the number will differ — the engines retrieve from different source pools and weight them differently, so the metric is only meaningful with the engine attached.
Share of model is a primitive, in the database sense: one raw number per engine that every higher-level report is built on. Competitive share of voice, category leadership, week-over-week deltas — all derive from it. It adapts the classical share-of-voice idea to a surface where the denominator is generated answers rather than ad impressions.
Because generative answers vary run to run, the number is only as trustworthy as its sampling: a fixed prompt set, a consistent cadence, and enough runs to smooth variance. One-off spot checks produce a share-of-model anecdote, not a metric.
Why it matters for ecommerce
Per-engine resolution is the entire point. A brand at 15% share of model on ChatGPT and 5% on Perplexity has a Perplexity problem that a blended average would have buried — and the fix differs by engine, because PDP copy that moves ChatGPT does not reliably move Perplexity, which leans harder on third-party citation tails.
For a VP of Ecommerce, share of model on buying-intent prompts is the leading indicator that sits closest to revenue: it predicts AI-referred traffic and agent-drafted carts before either shows up in analytics. For the SEO lead, it is the AI analog of an impression share report — familiar enough to defend in a monthly review.
Example
A hair-serum brand tracks a 40-prompt set on ChatGPT and Perplexity. Week one: the flagship 30ml bottle appears in 7 of 40 ChatGPT responses (17.5%) and 14 of 40 Perplexity responses (35%). The gap is the diagnosis — Perplexity finds the PDP easily, while ChatGPT's answers favor competitors with stronger review-site coverage. That week's work list becomes review-placement outreach, not another PDP rewrite. Illustrative numbers; the read pattern is the point.
How eCommerce Insights computes it
Share of model is computed per SKU, per engine, per week (daily on the Growth plan), with the full answer history retained from prompt tracking runs. SKU numbers roll up to brand level on demand, and the per-product reading feeds each SKU's citation score. The dashboard view is described under SKU-level tracking.
Related terms
- Share of voice (AI) — the competitive, relative counterpart.
- Prompt tracking — how the underlying data is collected.
- Brand mentions — the raw signal being counted.
- Citation analysis — the qualitative layer on the same runs.
- AI visibility score — the composite built on top.
Ask AI about share of model
Have your favorite AI engine apply this definition to your catalog.
Frequently asked questions
How is share of model calculated?
Why report per model instead of blending engines?
What is a good share of model number?
Should share of model be measured per brand or per SKU?
How is share of model different from share of voice?
Go deeper
See share of model per SKU, per engine, per week. Start the 14-day free trial — no credit card.